On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 04:33:49PM +0000, Always Learning wrote: > Is systemd the beneficial, reliable, useful and workable "improved init > system" or something with circa 275,000 lines of coding compared to > init's circa 10,000 lines ? Things I have learned in programming > include modular is better than monolithic, and less code better than > M$-style bloatware which systemd appears to be.
This is a typical comment which clearly indicates very little actual knowledge of systemd. There's really not much to say other than that. > Just what is Fedora's and Red Hat's Plan B when the revolt against > systemd escalates ? Whom is going to apologise for fouling-up Red > Hat's EL and our beloved Centos ? Well, that's certainly dramatic. But the answer is simple: show us the code. If it "escalates" to the point where we have better options, that's a huge win for everyone. -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
