On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Lamar Owen <lo...@pari.edu> wrote: > On 04/02/2015 03:55 PM, Always Learning wrote: > >> Is there a commercial motive for this 'unwelcome by most' change ? >> > > Do you have data to prove that it is unwelcome by most? It is unwelcome > by you and a few others I've seen comment; what percentage of the list's > subscribers do you suppose that might be? (It is neither welcome nor > unwelcome by me, as I've said before.) > > Feedback on the direction of the distribution's development is taken on > the -devel list; this list is for questions about using the distribution. > > See my reply earlier. The description of the centos-devel list says "this is strictly about development."
I take that to mean it is for developers. I am not a developer for CentOS. I don't know this, but I'm guessing there are many many users and admins of CentOS who are not on that list, like me. Even a "Please check out this thread for an important discussion about the future of CentOS release names." would have been appreciated. Now it's too late. (As I said earlier, it's not just the ISO name either). -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
