On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwa...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> All in the world, or all that have been created for currently installed
>> packages? Is this as bad as rpm packaging where any two different sources
>> are likely to conflict in name and/or contents?
>>
> Well we have not had this problem over the years, since most people upstream
> their policy. Right now if a customer installed a policy file which
> conflicted with the base policy, it will get overwritten. I guess if they did
> it will rpm then it would get you an RPM error/warning.
What does 'upstream' mean in the context of packages that aren't
included in RHEL base or EPEL? It just seems like a giant list of
global variables without any structure or namespace management.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
