Mark Pryor wrote: > Sure the SPEC is broken since the dependency is on a > binary file from package coreutils, rather than > another RPM.
I am not sure what you mean by that - are you implying that coreutils is not an RPM ? or do you mean to say that the dep is for a file rather than a rpm ? because, coreutils is a rpm, so other packages can depend on components from this rpm. And its fine for a rpm to have a dependency on a specific file, it does not need to only depend on other rpms. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
