In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --On Friday, October 05, 2007 9:11 PM +0000 Tony Mountifield > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > That very much depends on who you ask. Many people (myself included) > > prefer the original version which is actively developed by Digium in > > partnership with the community. > > Can you say why you prefer it? I've not followed any threads comparing the > two, so only have the issues listed in the voip wiki to go by. (See link in > previous post.) I've seen the frustration over Sun's control of OpenOffice, > and figured openpbx's fork is similarly motivated.
I haven't tried OpenPBX/CallWeaver, so it's not a technical viewpoint. I suppose it's more a question of trust or confidence. It appeared to me that Asterisk was forked to OpenPBX in a fit of pique by two or three individuals. I kept an eye on the OpenPBX website for quite a few months after the fork, and it appeared to me to quickly stagnate, and didn't seem to gain any momentum. In contrast, I found original Asterisk to have a lot of forward momentum and a large community around it. So I stuck with it, and haven't paid much attention to OpenPBX/CallWeaver more recently. It certainly seems much lower-profile than Asterisk. Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
