On 9/12/07, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Definitely a VERY dangerous option, I would say that that should have been > clearly stated in the RHEL docs.
This is one glaring area where anaconda could definitely use some improvement. There's a very distinct lack of 'user-friendly' documentation, both for install/kickstart options (which does have *some* documentation) and the iso building portion, which is something akin to voodoo where one must read the source to actually understand what's going on. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
