On Tue, September 11, 2007 12:58, James B. Byrne wrote: > > Is my understanding of this correct or in what matter is it defective? >
Evidently defective. I have found another reference that describes sub-packages. So the unqualified %files directive is for the base package and the qualified ones are for the sub-packages. Is this correct? Sincerely, -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
