Hello,

Per previous RFC, I've splitted and migrated CeGCC SVN codebase to Git.
For each upstream project, there is a separate git repository.
Potentially, that will allow to rebase CeGCC patchset onto pristine
upstream tree and follow upstream development more easily and/or
maintain CeGCC patchset in better form.

At this time, only w32api tree was rebased against upstream. w32api
also acquired lot of patches, thank to which it's now possibly to
compile number of 3rd-party applications, like GSPlayer, FtpSvr, tMan,
Win32++, etc.

The fact that there're number of repositories now doesn't mean that
now it is harder to build entire toolchain - there's a meta-repository,
cegcc-build, provided, which uses git submodules to pull all needed bits
easily. Actually, I structured this build repository along the lines of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_over_configuration - you just
need to clone that repository, follow very simple instructions in
README (nothing to edit or configure manually), and get the toolchain
built by running one command (which is itself just old good
build-mingw32ce.sh).

Repositories are currently hosted at Gitorious - I'd like to discuss
that further, ideally I'd like to see them hosted within bounds of
existing CeGCC project, at SF.net.

I'd appreciate if all interested parties tried it, comments are welcome.

http://gitorious.org/cegcc

Quick start:

git clone git://gitorious.org/cegcc/cegcc-build.git
Then follow instructions in cegcc-build/README
(http://gitorious.org/cegcc/cegcc-build/blobs/master/README)


-- 
Best regards,
 Paul                          mailto:pmis...@gmail.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel

Reply via email to