Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Monday 18 May 2009 11:56:24, Danny Backx wrote:
>> According to
>> http://fpc.freedoors.org/fpc-2.2.0.source/rtl/win/sysosh.inc
>> the definition should be something like the patch below says.
>>
>> The copyright on this stuff is LGPL so I can take it over.
>
> Huh? How does this not violate point 8 at:
>
> http://www.mingw.org/wiki/SubmitPatches
>
> ... please don't do this.
>
I haven't clicked that link or read the patch (wasn't subbed at the time the
original post was sent and joined the thread late). Would a) the information
made available from MS' public symbol servers via the WinDBG 'dt' command, or
b) an article from MSDN Magazine be suitable sources to research the internals
of the CRITICAL_SECTION structure? (And note that just in case, I haven't
read either of those yet, so I'm not even sure if a) works and I'm only
inferring from the fact that I found b) by searching for CRITICAL_SECTION on
google books and finding a book that had a reference to the article's title
and claimed it documented internal members of the structure).
cheers,
DaveK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
