> >> I did not get the point, is there an >> intention to implement all the functions defined in the header files >> <windows.h>, <winbase.h> etc.? It would probably make sense, as this >> would >> allow easier port of certain applications from windows to windows mobile. >> Do >> you have such a plan? > > No. But, I can imagine a library (source based a-la gnulib, or compiled) > that implements common Ansi variants of Win32 functions would > ease porting efforts in some classes of applications. > I wrote something like that three years ago but unfortunately at this period I didn't know cegcc so it can only be compiled withy msvc. Recently I wanted to make it compile also with mingw32ce but this is too complicated and I get very ugly and obfuscated with lots of ifdef and special case. If you need some posix compatiblity layer on top of mingw32ce you can use a module called evil from enlightenment projet srd/efl/PROTO/evil. It's a good start if you want to work with mingw32ce and posix app.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/blackberry _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
