\network\x86> test3
Main 2001FB78
Deeper 20167B24

In my program, with two statements added in obvious places. 

        Danny


On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 12:24 +0900, Pawel Veselov wrote:
> I mean, something like this, but with Windows thread calls.
> (I can't run any cegcc code at the moment).
> Just wondering where would the stack addresses be for new
> threads.
> 
> Thanks!
>   Pawel.
> 
> [pv230...@druid]~/cprog$ cat stt.c
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <pthread.h>
> 
> static void prt_stk() {
>     int i;
>     fprintf(stdout, "my stack is near %p\n", &i);
> }
> 
> static void* t_start(void * n) {
>     prt_stk();
>     return 0;
> }
> 
> int main(int argc, char ** argv) {
> 
>     pthread_t t1;
>     pthread_t t2;
>     void * n;
>     prt_stk();
>     pthread_create(&t1, 0, t_start, 0);
>     pthread_create(&t2, 0, t_start, 0);
> 
>     pthread_join(t1, &n);
>     pthread_join(t2, &n);
>     return 0;
> 
> }
> 
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Danny Backx<danny.ba...@scarlet.be> wrote:
> > You probably mean something like the attached test. What do you want to
> > know about it ? I can run it on x86 and on ARM.
> >
> >        Danny
> >
> > On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 18:16 +0900, Pawel Veselov wrote:
> >> Should the prologue code be rewritten to have
> >> a thread created before main() is called?
> >>
> >> Also, it'd be interesting to see where are the
> >> new thread stacks are created, I've looked
> >> at how other OSes do that, and they just
> >> simply create a new segment. Since m$ seem
> >> to not give you stack segment for the stack
> >> completely, it should allocate thread stacks
> >> somewhere in that stack segment.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Johnny Willemsen <jwillem...@remedy.nl> 
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> >> gcc code may user more of the stack than whatever code that msvc
> >> >> produces, thus
> >> >> dipping into the red zone more often. So far, I don't see how the 64k
> >> >> limit of the
> >> >> stack on the main thread can be avoided at all..
> >> >
> >> > The only option I see (which also Danny proposed) is to create a worker 
> >> > thread, use that as main thread, then we can control the stack size.
> >> >
> >> > I will rewrite a few tests at our side to get some objects from the heap 
> >> > instead of from the stack.
> >> >
> >> > Johnny
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> > --
> > Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
> >
> 
> 
> 
-- 
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel

Reply via email to