On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 22:16 +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 February 2009 20:55:28, Danny Backx wrote:
> > The next thing to fail is mingw. I'm not sure whether I want to invest
> > in that given your remarks on mingw-w64. Is your experience that it can
> > replace the src/mingw in the cegcc tree ?
>
> I'm sorry, I can only read this with a sense that there's confusion
> on what are our local changes, and the relation between these trees.
>
> I'm hoping you don't actually believe that you only have to replace
> one component for the other and things will magically work.
Unfortunately, the only way to do that is to buy Visual C++ or whatever
it's called nowadays.
I was wondering : if we can benefit from upgrading our mingw
installation (especially the includes, I think), which would be the
better source. Obviously all the CE specific stuff that we've been
adding needs to be integrated.
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to
build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power of local
resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and
Ajax docs to start building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
