The only difference between the two DLLs is that one is compressed with UPX.
I can send both to anybody wanting to look at them, but personally I am
unable to help much because I never encountered such problem.
Pascal
2009/1/14 Danny Backx <danny.ba...@scarlet.be>
> Do you have two versions of that DLL to play with then ? Or are they too
> different to use for comparisons ?
>
> Danny
>
> On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 19:05 +0100, Pascal Georges wrote:
> >
> >
> > 2008/12/18 Danny Backx <danny.ba...@scarlet.be>
> > What's an o32_ptr ?
> >
> > Does all this mean that we're not filling up a structure in
> > the DLL, and
> > that UPX is doing the right thing but we're not ?
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I managed to get an user test my application (http://scid.sf.net)
> > under WM6.1 and I confirm that the DLL cannot be loaded unless it is
> > upx-ed.
> > Personaly I have a Dell Axim x51v with WM6.1 and I did not encounter
> > this problem.
> >
> > Pascal Georges
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> > It is the best place to buy or sell services for
> > just about anything Open Source.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB
> > _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list
> Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
> --
> Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
