On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 10:12 -0500, Craig Vanderborgh wrote:
> I need a backtrace() for newlib, like the one provided in glibc.  We
> need it here for debugging purposes.
> 
> I have spent a lot of time trying to come up with a stack trace that
> works, unsuccessfully.  I don't need to have symbol names in the
> trace, I'm willing look up function names in the link map or use
> arm-wince-pe-addr2line.  So it only has to produce addresses.
> 
> Does anyone know of a solution for stack traces on WINCE?  I have not
> been able to find a solution and could really use some ideas or help.

I have a link in my bookmarks that reads 
http://blogs.msdn.com/hopperx/archive/2006/09/14/754772.aspx

HoppeRx - the cure for your ailing device : Using MAP files - part 1

The site doesn't appear to respond right now though so I can't verify.

Also I was thinking gdb probably has the support for what you need
somewhere in its sources.

        Danny
-- 
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel

Reply via email to