On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 20:49 +0100, René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
> I was trying cegcc (or mingw32ce to be more precise) today and compiled
> the fibonacci program as an example. The C-Version worked quite well so
> I tried a C++ one too - and this did not work.
> As I have tried a "compiled-from-source" version I tried the binary one.
> The first thing I saw was, that the created binary was much larger now -
> but did not work either. - I had to reinstall the binary mingw32 and NOT
> install the windows dlls. If I would install them it would again fail to
> work.
Could you be more specific in the things you write ?
- In what way does the C++ version not work ?
- What is "a C++ one" ? Is this the same source but compiled with the
arm-wince-mingw32ce-g++ compiler ?
- Which version of our source are you using ? (Is the source the current
SVN version, or some other ?) Which binary ?
> So my question is: What is the task of this DLLs? - Are they needed? -
> Or is there no problem in not installing them?
Which DLL ?
Your statement that one C++ compile gives a much larger exe than another
C++ compile would indicate that on one of the two occasions you rely on
a DLL.
If you have an exe that fails due to a missing DLL, it will typically
fail to start, with a Windows dialog popping up mentioning that some
part of the application is missing. Is this what you see ?
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
