On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 13:42 -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> I meant using gcc instead of g++ for c++ code - gcc will work, it just
> wont pull in libsupc++.a/libstdc++.a by default. If one goes through
> the trouble of compiling with -fno-exceptions then they probably don't
> want libsupc++.a to be pulled in. (If libsupc++.a is pulled in, then
> they get the 40K and -fno-exceptions doesn't improve exe size.) So,
> they're probably better off using the gcc frontend instead of the g++
> frontend even for c++ code.
Doesn't use of a DLL remove most of this whole issue ?
DAnny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
