On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 10:06 +0000, Hywel B. Richards wrote:
> Thanks for the responses. I guess that confirms that my problem is down
> to the memory allocation.
>
> Pedro Alves wrote:
> > You could try reusing it, and/or writing your own
> > global operator new, operator delete, etc.
> This sounds like a good idea - I think that I'll try that. I guess I can
> extract the relevant code from newlib.
> > However, if you find that you can isolate the parts of
> > the code that are critical, it may be better to use a pool
> > or a special allocator for the memory management of those
> > time critical allocations/objects.
> I did try this for some classes for the linux port of this code, but the
> gain was very small. I guess that dlmalloc is just well-suited to this code!
Does anyone know what causes this? Are the CE coredll memory allocation
functions slow ? (Then eVC++ generated code should suffer from this
too.)
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
