Peter Kümmel wrote: > By the way, currently we use wcelibex for a port of Qt to wince > so we are in the same position as you, or worse because we only > support the ms tools: is it :) or :( ?
I took a quick look at wcelibex, and it seems to be more or less of the same scope as libmingwex.a - which is linked in by default on mingw32ce, and is a static lib. I don't quite understand what you mean by being in the same position, but if I have to chose, it is a :) :) I'm trying to cleanup my Qt4 port, which is currently 4.1 based. Unfortunately I've touched many files, which makes it non-trivial to merge into your Scusi (4.2 based). Here is my diffstat: 147 files changed, 9267 insertions(+), 1985 deletions(-) That's Core + Gui + Network + qt3support + svg + xml + some examples + some demos + a port of minesweeper from qt embedded (qt2). Too bad TT doesn't accept user contributions... It is really sad... I've been holding this port for what ??? almost two years latent on my drive, waiting to have a stable enough toolchain to release it. I'll upload it somewhere and then work from there. I should have released it much sooner, but there was always that something else waiting to be done. (Let me know if you want to take a look at the patch in the meantime.) Cheers, Pedro Alves ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
