Danny Backx escreveu:
>
> What is the issue why you wanted me to put the profile and docs build
> after the gdb build ?
> > function build_all
> > {
> > build_binutils
> > @@ -261,6 +286,7 @@
> > build_gdb
> > build_gdbstub
> > build_docs
> > + build_profile
> > }
> >
>
>Put it before build_gdb instead, so people who can't build gdb currently
>(x64 guys), will still have profile support built. Oh, and the same for
>the build_docs call.
Before, not after! :)
> Is it going to be solved as well, or is it
> something we still need to chase ? The SF compile farm can be a good
> tool situations like these.
>
The problem is in the hacky way wince support is made. Revisit this
thread for
a refresh:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=37206506
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=37206522
And this patch I posted that noone ever tested, so it was never applied:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=30974582&forum_id=49151
(Yikes, 2 months already! )
The problem will be gone with the gdbserver port. It is already working
much better than
our current gdb, but there is this one annoying bug related to dwarf
debugging and passing
big structures on the stack. Me goes to have dinner and nice bottle of
red wine for inspiration :)
Cheers,
Pedro Alves
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
