Kevin O'Connor escreveu: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 02:17:53PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: > >> Pedro Alves wrote: >> >>> Paul Sokolovsky wrote: >>> >>> >>>> But still, liboldname-ce would rather not export non-existent >>>> functions. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Oh, you are right, that was indeed a big thinko on my part. >>> There is indeed a thin write implementation in libmingwex.a, but you >>> are right in that liboldname should not >>> export those functions, since it maps the functions into coredll.dll. >>> >>> >> And here is the patch: >> No time to test this at the moment, but I am still applying, as it can't >> be worse than it is now. >> > > It still seems to be broken. I get: > > /home/kevin/src/vx6700/haret/toolchain-cegcc/lib/gcc/arm-wince-mingw32ce/4.1.0/../../../../arm-wince-mingw32ce/lib/libstdc++.a(pure.o):/home/kevin/src/vx6700/haret/cegcc/src/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/pure.cc:54: > undefined reference to `write' > And this was thinko 2. Boy do I feel dumb. I only committed half of the fix... I had missed adding the non-underscored versions of _unlink, _read and _write.
Should be ok now. Please update at least src/mingw. Cheers, Pedro Alves ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
