This is probably what I get for trusting people. I feel utterly betrayed. Pedro has just kicked me out of my own project, and he's done it for the wrong reasons.
I've tried to be calm about it (see my messages below), but I have every reason to be angry, because some of the things he writes are, in my opinion, not true. I've had no message to revert Nuno's submission. Many of the rules Pedro imposes are unwritten and left for me to find out after he got angry with me. Since Saturday Pedro has given me the silent treatment; the message is clear. So is mine. This is farewell. I see no point in trying to collaborate when there's no trust. With regrets, Danny P.S. My project http://sf.net/projects/wince-xcompile was created December 2005. Pedro's http://developer.berlios.de/projects/cegcc was created January 2006. We joined, and then moved to SF when Berlios's service was bad. Naively, I gave Pedro Admin rights after having setup the new site. And as of a couple of days ago, he abused those rights to take away my (1) mailing list admin, (2) project admin, and (3) developer access. If that isn't betrayal then I don't know what is. -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Pedro Alves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: mailing list admin ? > Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:52:39 +0100 > > Well ? > > Danny > > On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 13:14 +0100, Danny Backx wrote: > > I have seen no such messages. As you may be aware, not all E-mail > > arrives perfectly in this age of spam. > > > > Please reconsider. > > > > Danny > > > > On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 12:01 +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: > > > Danny Backx escreveu: > > > > Pedro, > > > > > > > > The admin password for the cegcc-devel mailing list doesn't work any > > > > more, and my name appears to be gone but yours is on it twice. > > > > > > > > Has something gone wrong ? > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, you have. > > > > > > You failed to reply to private mails from me and from Nuno about his > > > patches. You made > > > Nuno work for no reason. I've asked you to revert his new headers, but > > > you failed to do so. > > > I worry about what you are capable of doing behind my back. > > > > > > I've got tired of the "damn, I'll have to clean that up" feeling every > > > time you commit something. > > > I thought it would be clear to you by now, that cegcc doesn't use, and > > > *shouldn't* use mingw/include headers. > > > It uses *newlib* headers. They can't be mixed. So, no __CEGCC__ patches > > > on mingw/include. Period. > > > Why do you think there are comments about keeping the files in sync with > > > cygwin? It is exactly the same > > > issue there. They use newlib too. > > > > > > I wish you had started doing things right after the last talk we had > > > about patch reviewing, but you failed > > > to do so. > > > That last patch to fix gcc profiling support, with your name on the > > > ChangeLog entry, was just rude. > > > Putting your name on work you haven't done, is just disrespectful. > > > That was the drop that made the glass spill. > > > > > > You will certainly consider my actions rude, I'm sorry, but that is the > > > way it is going to be. > > > From now on, you are welcome to contribute patches through the mailing > > > list instead. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Pedro Alves -- Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
