On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Pascal Stumpf wrote:

> On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 21:51:14 +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
>> Ohai.
>>
>> Just informing you guys that I'm currently working on an OpenBSD port.
>> Already got most stuff building and a shitload of patches (though mostly
>> just #ifdef's).  I'll probably start making a branch in a few days,
>> though this will need to be merged with the other porting efforts
>> (FreeBSD ...).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Pascal
>
> So here's a patch with all the changes to make it compile on OpenBSD.
> It does not work yet, but I'd like to get this in as soon as possible to
> facilitate further work.
>
> These are mostly #ifdef's, adapting to new standards (scope of var decls
> in for loops), at least one 64bit bug and a fix for istr_string if it is
> fed a NULL pointer.  The database file patches contain some stuff that
> is specific to my port (on github, openbsd-wip/x11/cde), but I think the
> whole install framework should be revisited anyway to something that
> respects $PREFIX (for fake installation) and doesn't hardcode shared
> library versions.
>
>

Hi,

I am not sure what to do with this... It is far too large for me to be
able to review, and either it all goes in, or nothing does.  While
a lot of what I see seems ok, there are other things that aren't...

For example, The very first diff deletes a line
InstallLinkKitSubdirs($(DOCSUBDIRS))

from the top level Imakefile without explanation.  Why is this being
deleted?

Further down, I see:

> +       CXXLIB = CplusplusLibC

For Library.tmpl.  This should not be needed, it's already set
properly in Imake.tmpl.

Same for some of the other items.  I simply cannot commit this.

Lots of the other patches look good, but I simply do not have the time or
patience to try to seperate, evaluate and commit each one :)

What I need are seperate patches, small and self contained (or even a
collection of related patches for a given subsystem) that I can have
some hope of reviewing, commenting on, commiting, or rejecting.

Perhaps you and others working on the BSD ports could contribute to a
shared repo (maybe yours, I don't know) and arrange this.

We might even be willing to create a seperate 'BSD' branch where the
BSD patches could go until they are ready for master.  We are willing
to work with you on this, but I simply cannot deal with a 300K blob
of patches :)

[...]

-- 
Jon Trulson

"If the Martian rope-a-dope don't get him, he'll get himself, he'll
  come in too fast and punch himself out."
              - one of my brothers, referring to the Curiosity landing.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
cdesktopenv-devel mailing list
cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdesktopenv-devel

Reply via email to