> On Sep 6, 2018, at 4:06 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > wrote: > > > > On 9/6/18 12:42 PM, William Donzelli via cctalk wrote: >> It shows up in some of the DECdirectories (as do a lot of oddball VTs). >> > > Like the VT62 'TRAX' terminal. I know that one did get built, though probably not shipped much since TRAX was dead on arrival. But its close relative, the VT61/t, did ship in significant numbers for Typeset-11 as the terminal for classified advertising entry and low end text entry. It looks like a VT52 on the outside, but inside are a whole pile of boards, all single-sided etch with many hundreds of jumpers to compensate for not being two-sided. Not cheap, presumably, but still cheaper than the VT71 with its LSI-11 and (character-mode) display processor, very roughly a text-only GT40. paul
- Re: Oddball Terminal... Mark J. Blair via cctalk
- Re: Oddball Terminal... Jon Elson via cctalk
- Re: Oddball Terminal... Ed Sharpe via cctalk
- Re: Oddball Terminal... Liam Proven via cctalk
- Re: Oddball Terminal... John Many Jars via cctalk
- Re: Oddball Terminal... Ed Sharpe via cctalk
- Re: Oddball Terminal... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- Re: Oddball Terminal... Warner Losh via cctalk
- Re: Oddball Terminal... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- Re: VT100's Al Kossow via cctalk
- Re: VT100's Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: VT100's William Donzelli via cctalk
- Re: VT100's Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: VT100's Eric Smith via cctalk
- Re: VT100's Carlo Pisani via cctalk
- Re: VT100's Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: VT100's Al Kossow via cctalk
- Re: VT100's Christian Corti via cctalk
- Re: VT100's Eric Smith via cctalk
- Re: VT100's Tapley, Mark via cctalk
- Re: VT100's Ethan Dicks via cctalk