Had the notice here, can confirm. On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 1:01 AM, jim stephens <jwsm...@jwsss.com> wrote:
> maybe the bounces from the DDNS attack today? Wouldn't be surprised. It > was that serious. 8.8.8.8 may not have had problems, but anyone else using > something from the attacked DNS provider would have come up gooseeggs, and > maybe that bounced a lot of stuff the list sent out. > > Thanks > Jim > > On 10/21/2016 7:29 PM, Jay West wrote: > >> 100% of the sub disabled was in the @gmail.com domain, for domainkeys >> according to the message. >> > >
