Top posting because.... It takes two (at least) to start it, and you certainly played your part.
While it is not "forbidden" to just post a URL without any explanation, it would be a good idea to include something with it so that we know if we want to click on it or not. Otherwise, it's going to just be skipped by a lot of people that might have had an interest but weren't interested in going there blindly. Regardless of if one agrees with fred or not, I think he stated his concerns without being rude. Let's keep the namecalling and rudeness out of it. Nuff said. J -----Original Message----- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of wulfman Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2016 8:55 PM To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk@classiccmp.org> Subject: Re: http://hackaday.com/2016/05/29/dragging-teletypes-into-the-21st-century/?utm _source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28H ack+a+Day%29&utm_content=FeedBurner+user+view I did not start the fire. On 5/29/2016 6:43 PM, Fred Cisin wrote: > On Sun, 29 May 2016, wulfman wrote: >> You either have a stick up your ass, are too stupid to know the >> difference between a malware link and a real link OR both. >> Now go back to your worrying about the 0.00001% of links that contain >> malware. > > I'm glad to hear it. > > OK, initially, I was glad that you've never encountered it. > But, your current rude behavior changes that, to being glad that you > have that perception of it. > > > > > > -- The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the named addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized use, copying, disclosure, or distribution of the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited by the sender and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail.
