Hi Clemens I’m “quite”* surprised. Do the authors of these programs offer any explanation as to why the scaling programs (given that these are the ones that usually provide F/I information for subsequent programs) bother to calculate sigmas if they’re going to be ignored?
Harry * for “quite” surprised, read “you could have knocked me down with a feather”. > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 09:22:04AM +0100, Harry Powell wrote: >> Only comment is that (surely) any decent refinement program these days >> would down-weight any reflections with negligible I/sig(I) (for example, >> those in the “unobserved” high resolution regions) so that they do not >> contribute (significantly) to the refinement. > > Not all refinement programs use sigmas as far as we know. ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
