Hello all, I hope this message finds you well.
In my current data set, I’ve encountered a discrepancy between the completeness in the high-resolution shells in merged statistics vs the refinement statistics. For example, when I look at my merged statistics file, output by Xia2 dials, the completeness in the high-resolution shells are 97.6%. When I take this data and subsequently refine it in PHENIX I get extremely different completeness ranges in the high-resolution shells, but I cannot figure out why this large difference is occurring. I’m reaching out to you, our esteemed community, for any insights or advice you might have. Has anyone else faced a similar challenge? If so, how did you navigate through it? Your experiences and suggestions could be invaluable in helping me understand and resolve this issue. Thank you in advance for your time and expertise. Best regards, Liliana see a side-by-side image of the files I mention in the message in https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Y783MzlnqVwXRCtiLeV0Y2EpmkeDL2nd/view?usp=sharing ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
