I am not a proper chemist, but I remember that during my college classes my 
professor emphasized that ^x is a measured value and not really related to 
stoichiometry. If someone has something to add…

Best

Rafael Marques da Silva
Mestre em Física Biomolecular
Universidade de São Paulo

Bacharel em Ciências Biológicas
Universidade Federal de São Carlos

phone: +55 16 99766-0021

           "A sorte acompanha uma mente bem treinada"
________________________________________________

De: ABHISHEK SUMAN<mailto:00002fccd9428006-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk>
Enviado:terça-feira, 16 de agosto de 2022 14:41
Para: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Assunto: [ccp4bb] Off-topic question related to ITC binding studies

Hello everyone!

Hope this email finds you well. I have an off-topic question regarding ITC 
binding studies, which was asked by a reviewer.

We performed an ITC binding study (using Affinity ITC, TA Instruments) to 
evaluate protein-DNA interaction which resulted in a perfect sigmoidal curve. 
We used the ‘one set of sites’ binding algorithm (“independent” model) for 
curve fitting and to calculate binding and thermodynamic parameters. The study 
suggested two copies of the protein binding to a single duplex DNA, i.e., the 
stoichiometry of protein:DNA is 2:1 (N=2). The ITC calculated the KD 
(equilibrium molar dissociation constant) in μM (micromolar). But the reviewer 
is asking to report the KD in (micromolar)^2 instead of micromolar mentioning 
that the binding reaction is 2A + B <-> (A2)B and the complex is (A2)B and not 
AB. Though we're trying to explain to the reviewer that we couldn't find any 
software that can compute the KD in (micromolar)^2 for the stoichiometry of 2 
but he is not agreeing to it. We have used the NanoAnalyze software from the TA 
instrument. This software does not have a model to measure the KD in 
(micromolar)^2.

I would be grateful if you could help me to resolve this problem or at least 
let me know what explanation might be appropriate to answer the reviewer’s 
concern that it’s a general practice to report the KD in the Molar irrespective 
of stoichiometry.

Thanks in advance.

Regards
Abhishek

Dr. Abhishek Suman
Ph.D (Structural Biology)
Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad
Kandi 502 284 Sangareddy
Telangana INDIA
Contact: +91 91002 74548, +91 80843 11898
Email: abhisheks.i...@gmail.com<mailto:abhisheks.i...@gmail.com>
----------------------------------------------------
P Please don't print this e-mail or attachment unless necessary. Preserve trees 
on the planet.


Disclaimer:- This footer text is to convey that this email is sent by one of 
the users of IITH. So, do not mark it as SPAM.



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1


########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to