One of the most lucid explanations of how translational NCS results in peaks in 
a self-Patterson map is provided in Phil Evans’ classic paper, “Rotations and 
rotation matrices”, which is an Open Access publication. In particular, check 
out Figure 4, which illustrates a non-crystallographic dyad axis parallel to a 
crystallographic screw dyad.

Acta Christ. (2001) D57, 1355-1359.
https://journals.iucr.org/d/issues/2001/10/00/ba5006/index.html

Diana

**************************************************
Diana R. Tomchick
Professor
Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry
UT Southwestern Medical Center
5323 Harry Hines Blvd.
Rm. ND10.214A
Dallas, TX 75390-8816
diana.tomch...@utsouthwestern.edu<mailto:diana.tomch...@utsouthwestern.edu>
(214) 645-6383 (phone)
(214) 645-6353 (fax)




On Feb 3, 2021, at 10:33 AM, Jon Cooper 
<0000488a26d62010-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk<mailto:0000488a26d62010-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk>>
 wrote:


EXTERNAL MAIL

Hello, in the self-rotation function the peaks arising from the NCS rotation 
axes are good at hiding under the peaks for the crystallographic rotations, 
which is because they are actually translational NCS elements, I think. Also, 
sorry Eleanor, a double-check on wikipedia confirms the space group ambiguity 
is actually between I422 and your original choice I4(1)22. Did you do something 
special to get good anomalous to 2.7A e.g. wavelength, covalent modification, 
etc? Hope this helps. Cheers, Jon.C.


Sent from ProtonMail mobile



-------- Original Message --------
On 3 Feb 2021, 13:59, Eleanor Dodson < 
0000176a9d5ebad7-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk<mailto:0000176a9d5ebad7-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk>>
 wrote:

I would look VERY carefully at your data processing. CCP4I2 report is a good 
place to start.
The self rotation with the ring around the edge is hard to reconcile with two 
molecules in the asymmetric unit.

Are the images clean or streaky? Do you have a photo of the crystal?
And by the way - you cannot decide on spacegroup I422 or I 42 2 2 till you 
solve the structure..
Eleanor

On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 12:12, Randy John Read 
<rj...@cam.ac.uk<mailto:rj...@cam.ac.uk>> wrote:
Dear John,

It’s hard to be absolutely certain from the reproduction, but it looks like you 
have equally high 2-fold axes all around the xy plane in the self-rotation 
function.  Do you have an explanation for that?

It would be helpful to know the heights of the Patterson peaks relative to the 
origin peak.  However, assuming that the ones you have listed are all 
relatively high, this can be interpreted in terms of a commensurate modulation 
or, in alternative terminology, a multiple tNCS vector.  All of the peaks are 
approximate multiples of the same translation vector, i.e. 1/2, 1/2, 1/6.

1/2, 1/2, 1/6
2/2, 2/2, 2/6, equivalent to 0, 0, 1/3
3/2, 3/2, 3/6, equivalent to 1/2, 1/2, 1/2

The next three in this series would be the same vectors in the opposite 
direction, i.e. related by the inversion operator in the Patterson.  If the 
Matthews coefficient suggests 2 copies, you could probably have 3 in the 
asymmetric unit related by multiples of the same vector, but not 6.

So in Phaser you would express this as
TNCS NMOL 3
TNCS TRA VECTOR 0.5 0.5 0.169

Best wishes,

Randy Read

> On 3 Feb 2021, at 11:34, leo john 
> <ljohn16012...@gmail.com<mailto:ljohn16012...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Sticking to the same doubt:
>
> Just to check the correct symmetry and space group, I have now processed my 
> data in P1 and I4 followed by running MOLREP for self-rotation function 
> (Figure attached).
>
> Can we conclude now on the correct space group and oligomeric state.
>
> Thank You all
> John
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:34 AM leo john 
> <ljohn16012...@gmail.com<mailto:ljohn16012...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Dear All:
>
> I have a peptide that is crystallized in the space group I4122 with cell 
> dimensions 40,40, 200 Ang.
> Mathews Coefficient suggests 2 molecules/ ASU.
> Since I do not have a starting model for MR, I went for experimental phasing. 
> However, unsuccessful so far.
>
> Details about my dataset:
>
> 1) It has been collected at 2 Ang and has an Anomalous signal till 2.7
> 2) It has got Translational NCS.
> 3) I checked the self-rotation function using MOLREP (figure attached), but 
> not able to make anything out of it. Please suggest.
> 4) I got the translational and rotational peaks from the log file of MOLREP
>
> Peak 1: trans.vector /ort/ :        19.270        19.270        98.550
>                trans.vector /frac/:         0.500         0.500         0.500
>        Peak 2: trans.vector /ort/ :        19.270        19.270        33.326
>                trans.vector /frac/:         0.500         0.500         0.169
>        Peak 3: trans.vector /ort/ :        -0.000        -0.000        65.224
>                trans.vector /frac/:         0.000         0.000         0.331
>
> Sol_Rf   1     0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.4448E+06  
> 4.53
> Sol_Rf   2    89.99  112.50  180.00    0.00  180.00  -45.00    0.3561E+06  
> 3.63
> Sol_Rf   3   109.56    6.31  180.00    6.31 -140.88  173.69    0.4912E+05  
> 0.50
>
> These are unique peaks.
>
> My questions are:
>
> 1) How to read these MOLREP records and the plots to conclude something. How 
> can I guess the oligomeric state using the plot. Any link or suggestion will 
> be really helpful.
> 2) How to specify the TNCS during phaser run.
>
> Thank You all
> John
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
>
> <SRF_P1_I4.png>

-----
Randy J. Read
Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge
Cambridge Institute for Medical Research     Tel: +44 1223 336500
The Keith Peters Building                               Fax: +44 1223 336827
Hills Road                                                       E-mail: 
rj...@cam.ac.uk<mailto:rj...@cam.ac.uk>
Cambridge CB2 0XY, U.K.                              
www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.uk<http://www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.uk/>


########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of 
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB<http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB>, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk<http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/>, terms & conditions 
are available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

CAUTION: This email originated from outside UTSW. Please be cautious of links 
or attachments, and validate the sender's email address before replying.


________________________________

UT Southwestern

Medical Center

The future of medicine, today.

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to