Hi Nika,

Here you need some common sense. The green density in you polder map may just 
be the bulk solvent that was removed from the model to generate the polder map. 
In this case you have to use common sense and ask yourself a couple of 
questions:

  *   Is the density really from the ligand, of from some other component from 
your crystallization solution? Molecules like tris or hepes love it to 
masquerade for ligands of interest.
  *   Could it be that only part of the ligand is visible because the other 
parts are disordered or not present? This happens quite often. Instead of the 
full-ligand, a break-down product or reaction intermediate might have bound, or 
part of the ligand binding site is occupied by crystal contact.
In this case I would fit the part of the ligand which has convincing electron 
density, refine and look at the electron density maps to see if the fit to the 
density is convincing and if additional atoms could be added to the ligand. If 
you cannot fit the whole ligand, even after some efforts, I would submit a 
partially fitted model.

Best,
Herman



Von: CCP4 bulletin board <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> Im Auftrag von Nika Žibrat
Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. November 2020 12:29
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: [ccp4bb] phenix.refine with ligand with ambiguous electron density


Hello,



I have a question about protein-ligand, of which ligand displays an ambiguous 
electron density. I am solving a structure of protein with ligand  which was 
obtained via soaking. Structural characteristics indicate the ligand is present 
however the electron density is quite vague and too small for the size of the 
whole ligand. I did a Polder map which showed much larger area of green 
density. After insertion of my ligand into the green density in Polder I ran 
phenix.refine and there is a lot of red on the spot where the ligand is which 
was to be expected. This leaves me wondering how, if even do I incorporate the 
polder map data into my refine input.



My question is, how do I continue refining and validating the structure in this 
case?



Thank you,



Nika Žibrat


________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2Fcgi-bin%2FWA-JISC.exe%3FSUBED1%3DCCP4BB%26A%3D1&data=04%7C01%7CHerman.Schreuder%40SANOFI.COM%7C56080723579a4530a08008d8906c42c0%7Caca3c8d6aa714e1aa10e03572fc58c0b%7C0%7C1%7C637418142105522594%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=pebjZIXHZMUjaHn7qx55Io7vA%2F2TmW4h4Sgeio38wCs%3D&reserved=0>

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to