Dear all,
after the plethora of complaints about v. 0.9 when compared to v. 0.8, I
would like to argue in favour of the new version.
I find RSR is now much more robust, with a larger radius of convergence,
with very useful tools like tandem refinement, etc. which are
particularly useful with cryoEM maps but also work well with
conventional crystallography. I will certainly NOT go back
to 0.8.
There are only two issues that are annoying and maybe Paul could have an
eye on them:
-When performing RSR, crystallographic symmetry mates are not
considered. But this was already happening with 0.8.
-In some instances but not always, when there is a break of missing
residues in the model, RSR would force the residues flanking the
gap to join.
Having said that, thanks a lot, Paul, for your dedication to this superb
program over the years.
All the best,
Xavier
--
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
