Hi All,

   I am trying to generate a model using comparative modeling. Can
anybody suggest the quality of the model based on procheck summary.

 +----------<<<  P  R  O  C  H  E  C  K     S  U  M  M  A  R  Y  >>>----------+
 |                                                                            |
 | /var/www/PROCHECK/Jobs/7358861/7358861.pdb   1.5             1253 residues |
 |                                                                            |
*| Ramachandran plot:   87.9% core   10.2% allow    1.4% gener    0.4% disall |
 |                                                                            |
*| All Ramachandrans:   67 labelled residues (out of1235)                     |
+| Chi1-chi2 plots:      3 labelled residues (out of 771)                     |
 | Side-chain params:    5 better     0 inside      0 worse                   |
 |                                                                            |
*| Residue properties: Max.deviation:     4.9              Bad contacts:    0 |
*|                     Bond len/angle:    9.9    Morris et al class:  1  1  2 |
 |                                                                            |
 | G-factors           Dihedrals:  -0.13  Covalent:  -0.07    Overall:  -0.10 |
 |                                                                            |
*| Planar groups:    90.0% within limits  10.0% highlighted      13 off graph |
 |                                                                            |
 +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
   + May be worth investigating further.  * Worth investigating further.



Thanks,

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to