Dear Diana and CCP4BB subscribers,

I apologize for the mess created by our recent communication with Diana. The 
misunderstanding occurred because my replies to “ALL” went to senders, but were 
not posted at the CCP4BB site. This happened because my email address changed 
recently. As a result, Diana could only see my message with comments inserted 
by Ethan, which was hard to understand.

In reality, I agree with Diana that the riding hydrogens could not be omitted 
from the PDB submission if they were used during the refinement. This would 
create questions to the submitted structure because the Depositor refinement 
statistics would differ from that calculated from the submitted structure  
missing the hydrogens.

Regards,
Alex


From: Diana Tomchick <diana.tomch...@utsouthwestern.edu>
Date: Friday, February 28, 2020 at 12:34 PM
To: Alexander Aleshin <aales...@sbpdiscovery.org>
Cc: CCP4 <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Hydrogens in PDB File

[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
My structure contains riding hydrogens because (surprise!) the protein contains 
hydrogens, no matter the resolution of the data. Hydrogens should contribute to 
the calculated structure factors, because they do contribute to the observed 
structure factors. If I delete the hydrogens from the coordinates and re-refine 
the model (even keeping the B-factors constant), the geometry will be worse.

When using Refmac, you can opt to explicitly write out the riding hydrogen 
atoms to the final mmCIF file, why don’t you try that and see if it works for 
you?

From the Phenix documentation web site 
(https://www.phenix-online.org/documentation/reference/refine_gui.html<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.phenix-online.org%2Fdocumentation%2Freference%2Frefine_gui.html&data=02%7C01%7Caaleshin%40sbpdiscovery.org%7Ce21f5ba4e0ee48a2b87908d7bc8da049%7C0b162723004547deb0699f1a7aa955a1%7C0%7C0%7C637185188782353919&sdata=BA18fGAO7IUmBOvQDqI5ZXOpHfIztfyUXBn1EQJP%2FwY%3D&reserved=0>)

Optimization methods and other 
options<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.phenix-online.org%2Fdocumentation%2Freference%2Frefine_gui.html%23id9&data=02%7C01%7Caaleshin%40sbpdiscovery.org%7Ce21f5ba4e0ee48a2b87908d7bc8da049%7C0b162723004547deb0699f1a7aa955a1%7C0%7C0%7C637185188782363912&sdata=80mJPVgw5B%2FX%2BU56HczRIq%2Ftb3FtxQ8WB7tcKNGy9MI%3D&reserved=0>
Several other options are available for the types of optimization used; these 
typically apply globally, except as noted.

  *   Automatically add hydrogens to model runs phenix.ready_set to add 
hydrogen atoms (or deuteriums, if performing neutron crystallography) where 
appropriate. This usually only affects the R-factors at high resolution, but 
can be very helpful for improving geometry at any resolution. We recommend 
using explicit hydrogens on protein, nucleic acid, and ligand molecules 
throughout refinement. (We do not reocmmend adding hydrogens to waters unless 
you have exceptionally high resolution.) Hydrogen atoms will still be defined 
using the "riding" model unless otherwise requested, so they do not add 
parameters during refinement. (Note that this option can be left on if you 
already have hydrogen atoms in place and are refining as "riding"; if you are 
refining against neutron data and/or allowing hydrogen atoms to refine 
individually, you should uncheck the box, as it will otherwise replace the 
existing atoms.)

Diana

**************************************************
Diana R. Tomchick
Professor
Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry
UT Southwestern Medical Center
5323 Harry Hines Blvd.
Rm. ND10.214A
Dallas, TX 75390-8816
diana.tomch...@utsouthwestern.edu<mailto:diana.tomch...@utsouthwestern.edu>
(214) 645-6383 (phone)
(214) 645-6353 (fax)

On Feb 28, 2020, at 2:23 PM, Alexander Aleshin 
<aales...@sbpdiscovery.org<mailto:aales...@sbpdiscovery.org>> wrote:


EXTERNAL MAIL

Diana,
Your structure 6PWD contains riding hydrogens even though the resolution is  
only 2.5A. So, the lack of differences between Depositor and DCC values does 
not contradict my point. Now, try to delete the hydrogens and recalculate 
R/Rfree without re-refining B-factors. You’ll see a noticeable difference. It 
is because hydrogens contribute to calculated structural factors.

Alex

From: CCP4 bulletin board <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>> 
on behalf of Diana Tomchick 
<diana.tomch...@utsouthwestern.edu<mailto:diana.tomch...@utsouthwestern.edu>>
Reply-To: Diana Tomchick 
<diana.tomch...@utsouthwestern.edu<mailto:diana.tomch...@utsouthwestern.edu>>
Date: Friday, February 28, 2020 at 11:52 AM
To: "CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>" 
<CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Hydrogens in PDB File

[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Here is just one of many examples that illustrates what I was trying to say 
about deposition of the final mmCIF file from the final output of Phenix 
refinement. This is from the freely downloadable PDB validation report for PDB 
ID 6PWD. Search the PDB on my last name and download several of the validation 
reports, and if you find one that diverges a lot between the Depositor and DCC 
values, let me know. They should be so close to the same as to be meaningless, 
at least for depositions within the last 3-5 years (older ones may indeed 
diverge a lot, but we all can’t be held responsible for the outputs of 
now-obsolete software).

Diana


________________________________
UT Southwestern
Medical Center
The future of medicine, today.

________________________________
To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jiscmail.ac.uk%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwebadmin%3FSUBED1%3DCCP4BB%26A%3D1&data=02%7C01%7Caaleshin%40sbpdiscovery.org%7Ce21f5ba4e0ee48a2b87908d7bc8da049%7C0b162723004547deb0699f1a7aa955a1%7C0%7C0%7C637185188782363912&sdata=Rwvu9Yyhl2AHtXsc4kUQKR%2FhWA9kDTOhoRAJQYiwFCk%3D&reserved=0>

CAUTION: This email originated from outside UTSW. Please be cautious of links 
or attachments, and validate the sender's email address before replying.


########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

Reply via email to