Wouldn't c222 or c222(1) be included in the Phaser run if all orthorhombic sg's were requested?
Boaz
Boaz Shaanan, Ph.D.
Department of Life Sciences Ben Gurion University of the Negev Beer Sheva Israel On May 31, 2019 23:37, Diana Tomchick <diana.tomch...@utsouthwestern.edu> wrote:
Your native Patterson indicates pseudo C-centering. Are you sure you don’t have space group C222(1)?
If your space group is correct, it’s still pseudo C-centered. You should see that in the intensity-weighted reciprocal lattice.
You could try re-indexing on just the most intense spots to give you a data set indexed in a C-centered lattice. Use that data to solve via MR, then convert to the data indexed in the actual space group.
Diana
**************************************************
Diana R. Tomchick Professor Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry UT Southwestern Medical Center 5323 Harry Hines Blvd. Rm. ND10.214A Dallas, TX 75390-8816 diana.tomch...@utsouthwestern.edu (214) 645-6383 (phone) (214) 645-6353 (fax) On May 31, 2019, at 3:09 PM, Kevin Jude <kj...@stanford.edu> wrote:
Hello community, I wonder if I could solicit advice about a problematic dataset. I plan to solve the structure by molecular replacement and expect that the protein is relatively compact, ie not elongated. SAXS data supports this expectation.
The crystals diffract to 2.6 Å resolution and appear to be in P 21 21 2 with a = 49, b = 67, c = 94, which should fit <=2 molecules in the ASU with 40% solvent. The native Patterson shows a large peak (12 sigma) suggesting a tNCS vector of {0.5,
0.5, 0}.
If you're sharper than me, you may have already spotted the problem - c is the long axis of the unit cell, but tNCS constrains the proteins to a plane parallel to the a,b plane. Indeed, molecular replacement attempts using Phaser will not give
a solution in any orthorhombic space group unless I turn off packing, and then I get large overlaps in the a,b plane and huge gaps along c.
Since I believe that my model is good (or at least the correct shape, based on SAXS), I wonder if I'm misinterpreting my crystallographic data. Any insights into how to approach this problem would be much appreciated.
--
Kevin Jude, PhD
Structural Biology Research Specialist, Garcia Lab
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Stanford University School of Medicine
Beckman B177, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford CA 94305
Phone:
(650) 723-6431
To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: |
- [ccp4bb] tNCS incompatible with cell dimensions Kevin Jude
- Re: [ccp4bb] tNCS incompatible with cell dimension... Diana Tomchick
- Re: [ccp4bb] tNCS incompatible with cell dimen... Boaz Shaanan
- Re: [ccp4bb] tNCS incompatible with cell dimen... Kevin Jude
- Re: [ccp4bb] tNCS incompatible with cell dimension... Jrh Gmail
- Re: [ccp4bb] tNCS incompatible with cell dimen... Jonathan Cooper
- Re: [ccp4bb] tNCS incompatible with cell d... Eleanor Dodson
- [ccp4bb] AW: [EXTERNAL] [ccp4bb] tNCS incompatible... Herman . Schreuder
- Re: [ccp4bb] tNCS incompatible with cell dimension... Kevin Jude