Sadly Rafal is right the unit cell dimensions don't make sense - either the 
space group is wrong or the contents have been digested before crystallization.
The size of the overall unit cell is ~21 x 23 x 43.  Given a (DNA-centric but 
close enough) view that a duplex is ~25A wide and there are 3.4A per bp (and 
43A/3.4  gives 12bp) , if this 11mer was a simple symmetric duplex, there could 
only be 2 chains, max, but I222 has 8 asymmetric units.   

This handy tool gives the same answer in a more accurate manner:
http://csb.wfu.edu/tools/vmcalc/vm.html
It says that if the RNA is intact and the space group is P2, there is about 56% 
solvent.  If the space group is really I222, the solvent content would be a 
rather fascinating negative 75%.

   -Phoebe

On 4/20/18, 2:37 PM, "CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Randy Read" 
<CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK on behalf of rj...@cam.ac.uk> wrote:

    I think that starting with a direct methods program like shelxt would be 
fun.  If that doesn’t work, it could be interesting to try to solve it by 
molecular replacement with fragments varying from a tetraplex, a base pair or 
even just single bases.  (Assuming that Phoebe’s concern about twinning does 
not turn out to be correct…)
    
    Best wishes,
    
    Randy Read
    
    -----
    Randy J. Read
    Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge
    Cambridge Institute for Medical Research    Tel: +44 1223 336500
    Wellcome Trust/MRC Building                         Fax: +44 1223 336827
    Hills Road                                                            
E-mail: rj...@cam.ac.uk
    Cambridge CB2 0XY, U.K.                               
www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.uk
    
    > On 20 Apr 2018, at 20:09, Tim Gruene <tim.gru...@psi.ch> wrote:
    > 
    > Dear Rafal,
    > 
    > shelxt does not require the space group, it only needs the Laue group. If 
it 
    > finds a decent solution, it'll find also the space group for you.
    > 
    > Best,
    > Tim
    > 
    > On Friday, April 20, 2018 3:30:36 PM CEST Rafal Dolot wrote:
    >> Dear CCP4BB,
    >> 
    >> I've recently collected data for 11mer build of DNA (9xG, 2xT). XDS, and
    >> DIALS gave me similar solution - SG: I2(1)2(1)2(1) or I222, with cell
    >> dimension 20.65, 22.96, 43.37, 90, 90, 90, what is too small for this
    >> size of the molecule. 11mer is rich in G, so we expect the G-tetraplex
    >> formation. Data were collected to almost 1 A, so it should be enough for
    >> trials with direct methods/ab initio solution. What I should do first to
    >> find correct SG and/or cell parameters?
    >> 
    >> Best regards,
    >> 
    >> Rafal
    > 
    > -- 
    > --
    > Paul Scherrer Institut
    > Tim Gruene
    > - persoenlich -
    > OSUA/204
    > CH-5232 Villigen PSI
    > phone: +41 (0)56 310 5297
    > 
    > GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A
    

Reply via email to