I think you need to look at the images. We found one case where the overall Rmerge didnt look too bad but there were horrendous streaks across many images. No idea what had happened but other crystals from the same batch were much better.
Eleanor On 9 November 2017 at 19:26, CPMAS Chen <cpmas...@gmail.com> wrote: > That is right. I had the data already and did not want to throw it away. > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Eleanor Dodson <eleanor.dod...@york.ac.uk> > wrote: > >> I think you need to worry about why that has happened, rather than get an >> automated rejection criteria! >> There must be some problem in the data collection for that to happen.. >> >> Eleanor >> >> On 9 November 2017 at 19:04, CPMAS Chen <cpmas...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Is there a way to reject diffraction images based on Rmerge? >>> >>> When I processed my data with XDS, I use AIMLESS in CCP4 to get merged, >>> truncated data. However, there is quite some images with high Rmerge, say >>> larger than 1. Is there a keyword I can use to reject these images based a >>> Rmerge cut-off, say 0.6? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Charles >>> >>> -- >>> >>> *************************************************** >>> >>> Charles Chen, Ph. D >>> >>> Research Associate >>> >>> University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine >>> >>> Department of Anesthesiology >>> >>> ****************************************************** >>> >>> >> > > > -- > > *************************************************** > > Charles Chen > > Research Associate > > University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine > > Department of Anesthesiology > > ****************************************************** > >
