Hi Bernhard,
The aromatic-carbohydrate (the hydrophobic face of carbohydrate) was first reviewed in Weis and Drickamer 1996 review in Ann. Rev. Biochem. 65, 441-473 (see their Fig. 5). They didn't use the term Pi interaction though for the reason Ian mentioned I suppose.
Regards,
Boaz
Boaz Shaanan, Ph.D.
Dept. of Life Sciences Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Beer-Sheva 84105 Israel E-mail: bshaa...@bgu.ac.il Phone: 972-8-647-2220 Skype: boaz.shaanan Fax: 972-8-647-2992 or 972-8-646-1710 From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Bernhard Rupp [hofkristall...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 8:18 PM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: [ccp4bb] Sugar-Pi-stacking Hi Fellows,
there are some smart chemists amongst you, so I wonder – what precisely am I to understand is the nature of pi-stacking between an aromatic residue or (whatever pi-orbital moiety) and a sugar moiety, disaccharide etc.?
Thanks for your help,
BR
------------------------------------------------------ Bernhard Rupp http://www.hofkristallamt.org/ +1 925 209 7429 +43 767 571 0536 ------------------------------------------------------ All models are wrong but some are useful. ------------------------------------------------------
|
- [ccp4bb] Sugar-Pi-stacking Bernhard Rupp
- Re: [ccp4bb] Sugar-Pi-stacking Ian Tickle
- Re: [ccp4bb] Sugar-Pi-stacking Christian Roth
- Re: [ccp4bb] Sugar-Pi-stacking Boaz Shaanan
- Re: [ccp4bb] Sugar-Pi-stacking Bernhard Rupp
- Re: [ccp4bb] Sugar-Pi-stacking Bärbel Blaum