James, On
On 20 Jul 2017, at 19:06, James Holton <jmhol...@slac.stanford.edu<mailto:jmhol...@slac.stanford.edu>> wrote: In my experience you need at least an average of 1 photon/pixel/image before even the best data processing algorithms start to fall over. I do not agree… both XDS and DIALS will (today) to pretty well with images which are a factor of 25 weaker than this (i.e. around .04 counts/pixel on average) https://zenodo.org/record/49559 I think is the right set, it was measured a while back. Background estimation was the bigger problem with this, since almost all of the pixels are 0… Have a play, data like this are quite entertaining. Cheers Graeme -- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail. Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message. Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
