To perform double labelling on your protein in an NON auxotrophic strain may be 
difficult. For the seleomet side, you can shut down the biosynthesis of Met by 
the addition of lysine, phenylalanine, threonine, isoleucine and valine; 
various protocols exist online. However to shutdown biosynthesis of cysteine, 
you need to add cysteine (acts as a negative feedback inhibitor on itself ), 
which defeats the point. I cannot find online if selenocys can inhibit 
biosynthesis of cysteine, like cysteine can. You could perform a small test 
expression by adding all the amino acids (lysine, phenylalanine, threonine, 
isoleucine, valine, selenomet, selenocys) 30 mins before induction, do your 
typical expression and purification and confirm by mass spec of labelling.

If not you could trying sulfur SAD, the various derivatives suggested today, 
soaks with halides, magic triangle. Mutate leucine residues to methionine. 

Dan

Daniel A Bonsor PhD.
Sundberg Lab
Institute of Human Virology
University of Maryland, Baltimore
725 W Lombard Street N370
Baltimore
Maryland
MD 21201
Tel: (410) 706-7457



-----Original Message-----
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Vito 
Calderone
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 11:47 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Se-Met and Se-Cys double labelling

I am working on a protein having 360 residues. In its sequence there are 3 Met 
and 5 free Cys.
I will need MAD to solve the structure since based on the sequence the closest 
homologue has 20% identity...I suppose MR would be very unlikely to work...so I 
would like to express a selenium derivative to exploit MAD.
Looking in the literature 1 Se-Met every 120 residues seems not to comply the 
threshold to get a good anomalous signal. For this reason I would like to 
exploit both Met and Cys so I would have 8 seleniums per 360 residues.
Could somenone suggest a reference to a protocol to express the double mutant 
protein in NON auxotrophic strains of E. coli which you have experienced 
working efficiently?
Thanks

Reply via email to