Hi Bernhard, We had the same problem recently and it looks like a bug. The workaround is to give it an alternative name the same as the name it should have. So FUC your FUC etc ??
Cheers, Robbie Sent from my Windows 10 phone Van: Bernhard Rupp<mailto:hofkristall...@gmail.com> Verzonden: vrijdag 26 mei 2017 12:56 Aan: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> Onderwerp: [ccp4bb] BMA NAG FUC Hi Fellows, upon updating a deposition of a glycosylated model, I see no longer the option in the ligand page to override the as incorrect flagged monomer assignments BMA NAG FUC etc. for glycan components. Instead, a mandatory mismatch correction is demanded. The suggestion of alternate identifiers, which was present before is also missing, together with the override option). The validation still works fine. Is this a new ‘feature’ or am I ignorant of a new policy? In principle I agree that using different monomer names for free monomer vs bound ones could be useful – a residue is not a free amino acid, and data miners have no easy means to distinguish such. The same argument can be made for sugars as bona fide ligands vs component of a glycan. Best, BR ------------------------------------------------------ Bernhard Rupp CVMO http://www.hofkristallamt.org/ b...@hofkristallamt.org<mailto:b...@hofkristallamt.org> +1 925 209 7429 +43 676 571 0536 ------------------------------------------------------ Many plausible ideas vanish at the presence of thought ------------------------------------------------------
