The fact that it is less the discrepancy in number than the breaking of pairwise correlation points in that direction... Br
On Apr 2, 2017 1:31 AM, "Phoebe A. Rice" <pr...@uchicago.edu> wrote: > At long last, a brilliant theoretical framework for observations > previously dismissed as mere discrepancies! > This being Saturday, can the postulated time-dependent decay of previously > observed observables also be applied to explain the apparent discrepancy in > number of socks entering the wash vs. number recovered? > Phoebe > > ------------------------------ > *From:* CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Bernhard > Rupp [hofkristall...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, March 31, 2017 4:36 AM > *To:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK > *Subject:* [ccp4bb] Ligand electron density > > Hi Fellows, > > > > due to the change of month on Sa I am releasing already today > > the first page of an until Sa embargoed reprint on concerns > > about theoretical principles of electron density reconstruction. > > > > The paper is available on my dropbox (full paper after Sa): > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/30662912/Rupp_2017_Phys_ > Rev_Letters_Electron_Density.pdf > > > > Best wishes, BR > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Bernhard Rupp > > Crystallographiae Vindicis Militum Ordo > > http://www.hofkristallamt.org/ > > b...@hofkristallamt.org > > +1 925 209 7429 <(925)%20209-7429> > > +43 676 571 0536 <+43%20676%205710536> > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Many plausible ideas vanish > > at the presence of thought > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > >
