On May 12, 2015, at 12:29 PM, Roger Rowlett <rrowl...@colgate.edu> wrote:
> Was the research publicly funded? If you receive funds from NSF, for example, > you are expected to share and "make widely available and usable" software and > inventions created under a grant (section VI.D.4. of the Award and > administration guide). I don't know how enforceable that clause is, however. The funding shouldn’t matter. I suggest that a publication that has the purpose of describing non-open source software should be summarily rejected by referees. In other words, the power is in our hands, not the NSF’s.
