Yes that was it, I had built it previously & forgot.  Forcing it fixes it.

Thanks!

Cheers

-- Ian

On 14 March 2015 at 18:00, Marcin Wojdyr <marcin.woj...@diamond.ac.uk>
wrote:

> Dear Ian,
>
> Hard to tell without more details. What options are passed to the
> configure scripts in mmdb2 and libccp4? (you can find it in the output)
> The options include either "--disable-shared --enable-static" or the
> other way around.
>
> Maybe you built it before setting BUILD_STATIC, and then when you
> tried to build it again you got message:
> *** Skipping [module] (package and dependencies not updated) ***
> In such case either remove the install directory or do:
>
> ./build --force libccp4
>
> Cheers
> Marcin
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:17:16PM +0000, Ian Tickle wrote:
> > Hello All
> >
> > I want to build static libs (libccp4.a etc.), basically to avoid hassle
> > when deploying executables of my own programs to other machines that are
> > not on my LAN and don't have up-to-date compilers or system libraries.
> >
> > I downloaded the CCP4 sources & followed instructions in the README,
> > basically AFAICS just 'setenv BUILD_STATIC 1' (tcsh) and './build libccp4
> > etc.' which claimed to be successful.  But I can't find libccp4*.a
> > anywhere.  In fact 'find' says that the only .a files are in the
> > cmake-3.0.2 directory and are called 'libtest*.a'.  I found
> > 'libccp4c.so.0.0.0' in builddir/libccp4/ccp4/.libs so it seems to be
> > building the dynamic libs.  I also tried 'setenv STATIC 1' but got the
> same
> > result.
> >
> > What am I doing wrong?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > -- Ian
>
> --
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or
> privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If
> you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the
> addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not
> use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to
> the e-mail.
> Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and
> not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
> Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any
> attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any
> damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be
> transmitted in or with the message.
> Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England
> and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and
> Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
>

Reply via email to