If you find MolProbity a useful tool then please look at the statement
at the top of
http://molprobity.biochem.duke.edu/
The statement reads:
"URGENT: For the survival of MolProbity, we need your supporting
comments or letters.
The MolProbity renewal NIH grant scored well but not well enough,
and reviewers specifically
asked for more user feedback. Please send us your stories about
how you use MolProbity,
why you value it, and how it has helped your research. We are
resubmitting the grant -- to
maintain the resource, update features, and develop new ways to
help people do much
better at low resolution.
Send to david.richard...@duke.edu, before February 20 -- either a
formal letter of support,
or just useful, quotable comments in email. "
I find MolProbity very useful and am just drafting such an email.
Hope it is OK to send this to the ccp4bb. Many people use MolProbity
from their own sites, or
using 3rd party software tools (such as buster-report or the wwPDB
validation server) so they
would not have seen the message.
Oliver
------------------
Dr Oliver Smart
Director SmartSci Limited
http://www.smartsci.uk/
& Consultant Global Phasing Ltd
http://www.globalphasing.com/
