Re: [ccp4bb] Reliable criteria to tell Anomalous or not?

[Boaz Shaanan]

Also, if you process your data using XDS, it'll give you good indication for the strength of the anomalous signal. I find the XDS and Aimless indications to agree quite well.        Boaz     Boaz Shaanan, Ph.D.                                         Dept. of Life Sciences                                      Ben-Gurion University of the Negev                          Beer-Sheva 84105                                            Israel                                                                                                                  E-mail: bshaa...@bgu.ac.il Phone: 972-8-647-2220  Skype: boaz.shaanan                  Fax:   972-8-647-2992 or 972-8-646-1710                          From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of CPMAS Chen [cpmas...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 11:05 PM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: [ccp4bb] Reliable criteria to tell Anomalous or not? Dear All CCP4 users, Recently, I have protein crystals cocrytallized with Br-containing ligand. sometimes, I feel confusion about whether the data have reliable anomalous information or not. Do you guys have some recommendation of the criteria? phenix reported anomalous measurability, CCP4/aimless has RCRanom. Sometimes, they are not consistent. Thanks! Charles -- *************************************************** Charles Chen Research Associate University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology ******************************************************