Dear Bjørn,
I guess the first step to enlightment is to recognize that we as mere mortals 
are not able to deduce the space group from diffraction data alone. All 
Aimless, XDS etc. can produce are educated guesses what the space group might 
be. Especially when twinning is involved, the crystal packing may not heed the 
rules and classifications that we humans try to impose. In many cases, one 
might have to go down to P1 and solve the structure in P1 to find out what the 
true space group is.

Here are some comments to your questions:
-the same protein under the same crystallization conditions and even in the 
same drop may produce crystals with very different crystal packings, even with 
the same unit cell, so your 4 and 7.5Å crystals may be different.
-If there is no way to fit the protein in the asymmetric unit that is a very 
strong indication that you do have twinning.
-There have been some discussions in the CCP4BB, but I do not believe that 
twinning can generate body centering.
-You might be barking at the wrong tree and the twinning axis might be parallel 
to the 4-fold axis, or even generating the 4-fold. You may even have 4-fold 
twinning.
-You may have pseudo body centering, which is perfect at low resolution, but 
breaks down at higher resolution. As a test, you could process your 4Å data 
only to 7.5Å and see what the statistics would look like. 

What I would do:
If you have more crystals, collect data on them all, maybe there is one which 
is not or not perfectly twinned.
If there is a model which could be used for molecular replacement: process the 
data in P4, I4, P222 and P1 and run molecular replacement with all possible 
space groups for both crystals.

However, at 4Å with unclear twinning, solving your structure will be tough.

Best,
Herman


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von Bjørn 
Panyella Pedersen
Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. Juni 2014 21:01
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: [ccp4bb] possible twinning issue in P4212 / I422

Dear All,
I have a strange potential twinning issue that I cannot understand. I've 
searched high and low on all the internets to find an answer but have come up 
empty-handed, so I look to the wisdom of The Board to enlighten me.

I have a 4'ish Å dataset that processes nicely in P 4 21 2 (#90). 
However intensity distributions indicate possible almost perfect twinning (eg. 
<I^2>/<I>^2 : 1.592 ). So I speculate that the real space group might be P 4 
(#75).

Recently we collected a new fairly low resolution (7.5Å) dataset, from the same 
type of crystals (same purification, same conditions).
But the space group in XDS and aimless now comes out very clearly as either 
I422 (#97) or I4212 (#98) (screw-axis is unclear given the data). 
The unit-cell parameters are exactly the same as in sg #90, which btw. 
means that in the body-centered lattice there is no way the protein can fit in 
the asym. unit.

So I guess what I don't understand is: Is it possible to go from a primitive 
lattice to a body-centered lattice by twinning. Is this just a low-resolution 
artifact? Or is this a P4 unitcell that can appear like
P4212 or I422 depending on small variations (weak dehydration or similar).

Has anyone experienced something similar? Am I missing a basic facet of how 
twinning works, or is something else at play here?

Thanks for any insights or suggestions!

All the best,
/Bjørn

--
Bjørn Panyella Pedersen
Macromolecular Structure Group
University of California, San Francisco

Reply via email to