Dear Stefano,

Here few thoughts:
You should calculate the amount of holo/apo protein that you get after the 
column. A ratio 280/450 between 9-12 it will suggest that your protein is 
almost completely in the holo-form. So, I will be worried about the peak of 
flavin only if this ratio become much higher than 12.
If this is the case, I would analyze the flavin peak to evaluate if it is 
really FAD or, for example, FMN. You can do easily with a quick silica TLC. 
This mainly because can happen that during the folding there is a 
misincorporation of the cofactor (I am assuming that you are sure that FAD is 
your cofactor).
Otherwise, if your expression levels are too high, maybe the expression strain 
is not able to produce enough flavins to be incorporated. In this scenario, you 
can try to slow down the induction and/or  use more rich media (like terrific 
broth, where the excess of glycerol can also help in keeping bounded the 
flavin) as add 1-2 mM of riboflavin in the broth.

If this doesn't work, during the purification I would suggest to add some FAD 
in the lysis buffer (~50 uM) and 10% glycerol to increase the viscosity of all 
the buffers and reduce the diffusion. You would maybe need also to play with 
salt concentrations to see if there is an effect in the flavin binding. 
Remember: flavins are also light sensible. Be sure to keep the sample in the 
dark as much as possible during all the steps (i.e. use aluminum foil to wrap 
the column or the tubes where your sample is stored).

To remove FAD there are many protocols that you can follow, but mainly it 
require a dialysis in presence of KBr in a light acidic environment. You can 
find protocols in literature looking for papers by Edmondson, Van Berkel or 
Massey to start or chapter 11 in flavoprotein protocols (Vol 131, methods in 
molecular biology).

Good luck,
Roberto

__________________________________
Roberto  Orru, PhD
Department of Chemistry, Emory University
1515 Dickey Drive
Atlanta, GA. 30322 (USA)



-----Original Message-----
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Benini 
Stefano (P)
Sent: 13 March, 2014 18:40
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] off-topic: protein losing FAD during purification

Dear All (those dealing with wetlab stuff..),

While purifying a FAD containing protein we lose part of the FAD (on the gel 
filtration we clearly see two bands corresponding to holoprotein and free FAD).

We obtain crystals but diffracting to only about 4 A despite their beautiful 
look. Our hypothesis is that the crystals contain a population of molecules 
with and without FAD (?).

The questions are:

1) how to keep FAD bound to the protein during purification and crystallization?

2) how to completely remove FAD from the protein?

Thank you very much for any help provided!

Best regards

Stefano (part-time wetlab person)


Dr Stefano Benini, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor

First International workshop: "Molecular Basis of Fire Blight", Bolzano 
15.10.2014

Laboratory homepage:
http://pro.unibz.it/staff2/sbenini/B2Cl.htm

Personal homepage
http://pro.unibz.it/staff2/sbenini/

"I don't like anything that's fake and I hate pretenders!"

*********************************************
Bioorganic chemistry and Bio-Crystallography laboratory (B2Cl) Faculty of 
Science and Technology Free University of Bolzano Piazza Università, 5
39100 Bolzano, Italy
Office (room K2.14):  +39 0471 017128
Laboratory (room E.021): +39 0471 017910
Fax: +39 0471 017009
********************************************
"ogni giorno in più è un giorno in meno."

________________________________

This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
prohibited.

If you have received this message in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
original message (including attachments).

Reply via email to