Dear All,
  I got a Se-crystal diffracted to 3.3A. The protein is predicted to be a
coiled coil. After I got the heavy atom positions from a shelxd based
programs from AutoRickShaw, I run phaser and phenix.autobuild to get a
initial phase shown in the attachment. I fit a "standard helix" into the
density maps. After that,  I did a two step iteration to improve my phases
similar to the methods mentioned in Roversi's paper "With phases: how two
wrongs can sometimes make a right".
Step 1: Run DM with current model, heavy atom positions, the initial
density maps to get a new DM map.
Step 2: In the new DM map, some new density appears. Fit new helixes in
this new map.
The iteration ends when I found no obvious helix densities. However, when I
run refinement, I still got very bad R/Rfree values. It seemed I got a lot
of model bias during the process above.

Now, I have some questions that puzzled me a lot.
1. Is there any programs that could help to compare and check the heavy
atom positions in shelxd solutions? Especially in cases when the solutions
are not obvious. SitCOM seemed very good, is there a 32-bit distribution of
this programs? Or any others have similar functions?
2. How to reduce the model bias and phase errors in my situations? any
suggestions?
3. Should I collect a MAD data instead of SAD data? How much would that
could help?

Best regards & Many thanks!

Yuan

Reply via email to