I am experimenting with ALMN cross-rotation using some old known structures. I was surprised to see what seems to be a requirement for the cell dimensions of the two crystals to be the same. Is that the case? Excerpts from the log follow. eab
Data line--- CROSS 5 30 . .. OPENED INPUT MTZ FILE Logical Name: HKLIN Filename: /a/denzo/als060729/azx02/chbc1azx02r12.mtz . . . * Cell Dimensions : (obsolete - refer to dataset cell dimensions above) 170.1490 181.3120 240.5010 90.0000 90.0000 90.0000 . . . OPENED INPUT MTZ FILE Logical Name: HKLIN2 Filename: /a/denzo/ant101master/ant101_complete.mtz . . . * Cell Dimensions : (obsolete - refer to dataset cell dimensions above) 128.7980 168.5290 231.6520 90.0000 90.0000 90.0000 . . . Inconsistency in Cell Dimensions - replacing old: Old cell: 170.14900 181.31200 240.50101 90.00000 90.00000 90.00000 New cell: 128.79800 168.52901 231.65199 90.00000 90.00000 90.00000 If it is really changing the cell parameters of one of the datasets, won't that distort the patterson and interfere with correlation? Am I doing something wrong? The two files are specified as HKLIN and HKLIN2
