Well there's a funny thing. It seems that this is already in xia2 (strange 
moment when I wade in there to make the change and found it already made, it 
seems from my logs in May)

However, it seems that I have not actually released this version. My bad.

An updated release will appear shortly.

best wishes,

Graeme

On 5 Nov 2012, at 15:13, Graeme Winter wrote:

> Thanks indeed Eleanor, when I get a moment I will add this too to the xia2 
> cad script!
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Graeme
> 
> 
> On 5 November 2012 11:37, Antony Oliver <antony.oli...@sussex.ac.uk> wrote:
> Thanks Eleanor - guess I should have plumbed the depths of the CAD manual a 
> little further.
> 
> Works perfectly.
> 
> Antony.
> 
> ---
> Dr Antony W Oliver
> Senior Research Fellow
> CR-UK DNA Repair Enzymes Group
> Genome Damage and Stability Centre
> Science Park Road
> University of Sussex
> Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RQ
> 
> email: antony.oli...@sussex.ac.uk
> tel (office): +44 (0)1273 678349
> tel (lab): +44 (0)1273 677512
> 
> On Nov 5, 2012, at 11:24 AM, Eleanor Dodson wrote:
> 
> > Just give CAD the resolution cut off of the new data set..
> > Eleanor
> > From the CAD documentation..
> > RESOLUTION [ RESOLUTION OVERALL <dmin> <dmax> ] | [RESOLUTION FILE_NUMBER 
> > <i> <dmin> <dmax> ]
> >
> > Use either:
> >
> > RESOLUTION OVERALL <dmin> <dmax>
> > for overall resolution limits, or:
> > RESOLUTION FILE_NUMBER <i> <dmin> <dmax>
> > to set input limit for FILE_NUMBER <i>.
> > <dmax>, <dmin> are the resolution limits for the data to be included, i.e. 
> > data are included for which
> > (1/<dmax>)**2 >= 4 sin**2theta/lambda**2 >=(1/<dmin>)**2
> > NOTE: Defaults are 0.1 and 1000.0 Angstrom.
> >
> >
> > On 5 Nov 2012, at 09:53, Antony Oliver wrote:
> >
> >> Am I worrying about something unnecessarily?
> >>
> >> I have several protein-drug datasets, all in the same spacegroup, but 
> >> wildly varying resolutions.
> >> I wish to use the same reflections for calculating R-free in all cases.
> >>
> >> Using xia2 with a reference dataset for both indexing and R-free seems to 
> >> work fine, apart from the fact that the resulting mtz file, now contains 
> >> R-free labels for reflections that have no observations… i.e. taken from 
> >> the higher resolution "reference dataset"; see output below.
> >>
> >> I get essentially the same results using CAD to copy the R-free column 
> >> between mtzfiles….
> >>
> >> Is this actually a problem - or is it just my innate sense of tidiness 
> >> that wants the resolution values to be the same?
> >>
> >>
> >> Many thanks,
> >>
> >> Antony.
> >>
> >>  Col Sort    Min    Max    Num      %     Mean     Mean   Resolution   
> >> Type Column
> >>  num order               Missing complete          abs.   Low    High      
> >>  label
> >>
> >>    1 ASC      0      36      0  100.00     14.2     14.2  57.66   2.02   H 
> >>  H
> >>    2 NONE     0      36      0  100.00     14.6     14.6  57.66   2.02   H 
> >>  K
> >>    3 NONE     0      38      0  100.00     14.8     14.8  57.66   2.02   H 
> >>  L
> >>    4 NONE    0.0    19.0   132   99.18     9.52     9.52  57.40   2.02   I 
> >>  FreeR_flag
> >>    5 NONE  -30.6 10855.5 11647   28.03   202.72   203.43  57.66   3.17   J 
> >>  IMEAN
> >>    6 NONE    1.5   356.4 11647   28.03    11.52    11.52  57.66   3.17   Q 
> >>  SIGIMEAN
> >>    7 NONE    7.8  1040.0 11647   28.03   109.05   109.05  57.66   3.17   F 
> >>  F
> >>    8 NONE    1.4    23.8 11647   28.03     6.59     6.59  57.66   3.17   Q 
> >>  SIGF
> >>
> >>
> >>  No. of reflections used in FILE STATISTICS    16183
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Dr Antony W Oliver
> >> Senior Research Fellow
> >> CR-UK DNA Repair Enzymes Group
> >> Genome Damage and Stability Centre
> >> Science Park Road
> >> University of Sussex
> >> Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RQ
> >>
> >> email: antony.oli...@sussex.ac.uk
> >> tel (office): +44 (0)1273 678349
> >> tel (lab): +44 (0)1273 677512
> >>
> >
> 

Reply via email to